Sexting free sex no credit cards consolidating college loans federal

The federal government has promised to use obscenity laws to crack down on Internet erotica.

Training sessions have been conducted to teach federal prosecutors how to use obscenity laws in the 21st Century, and the first prosecutions have already begun against webmasters in Texas and West Virginia.

State prosecutors in Indiana, Alabama, Utah, Kentucky, and Florida have recently used these outdated obscenity laws to justify arrests of video storeowners and webmasters.

Expressive materials have been seized in these raids.

The courts therefore require that any work subjected to the obscenity test must be evaluated "as a whole," at least with respect to prurient interest and serious value. Under current technology, the lines readily blur as to what constitutes "the Website." It can certainly be argued that the court and the jury must consider the entire site, including all pages and all links.

The requirement that the work be evaluated "as a whole" prohibits the judge from simply ripping out certain explicit pages from a book or magazine, and determining that those portions meet the test, thereby declaring the entire work obscene. An argument can even be made that the whole work consists of links on linked sites, and so on and so on.

Sexting free sex no credit cards-89Sexting free sex no credit cards-87Sexting free sex no credit cards-69

It is doubtful that adult websites fit in with Ashcroft’s "Culture of Responsibility" that should be promoted by the media; and adult websites are surely one of the enemies in what Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has dubbed the "cultural war" in which he and others are now engaged.A statistically relevant sampling of the local community also demonstrated that over 98% of the residents admitted that they did not know what the word "prurient" meant.Those who claimed to know the definition could not accurately use the word in a sentence.Assume, for example, that a zealous prosecutor were to claim that Yahoo! Such a charge seems pretty far-fetched because of the sheer volume and diversity of the content contained on a large site such as Yahoo! Several prosecutions have already occurred against webmasters for images found on linked sites.Second, it is difficult to evaluate a website as a whole since each site takes up varying amounts of bandwidth at any given time, and is not an identifiable "thing" in the traditional, physical, sense.Second, the work must depict or describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, based on contemporary community standards.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!