The details on the 8 anomalous samples are listed in Table 2 of Dalrymple (1969, p. 51), which is reproduced at Ar-Ar Dating Assumes There is No Excess Argon? Rahmani, 1990, 'Location of Extraneous Argon in Granulitic-facies Minerals: A Paired Microprobe-laser probe 40Ar/39Ar Analysis,' Chem. As an example, the parent uraniunm-238 changes into the daughter lead-206; uranium-235 changes to lead-207; potassium-40 changes to argon-40; rubidium-87 changes to strontium-87; and samarium-147 changes to neodymium-143, which are the five parent isotopes that geologists use to date rocks.Carbon-14 is not used (radiocarbon) because most rocks do not contain carbon. They must find rocks that have the isotopes listed above, even if these isotopes are present in only minute amounts.Lassen, California ('dated' at 130,000 years; erupted in 1915 AD), and a basalt from Sunset Crater, Arizona ('dated' at 210,000 and 220,000 years; erupted in 1064-1065 AD). 'Thus while Snelling implied that Dalrymple  found severe problems with K-Ar dating when the truth is quite the opposite. Two-thirds of the time there is no excess argon at all. And in 25 times out of 26 tests there is no excess argon or there is so little excess argon that it will make only a tiny error, if any, in the final date for rocks millions of years old. Thus Dalrymple’s data is not consistent with a young Earth whatsoever.
Ngauruhoe, known to be less than 50 years old yielded three different ages—133 million years, 197 million years and 3.908 billion years(See the next post, “So How Old Are the Rocks, Anyway?Typically, this is a rock body that has formed from the cooling of molten rock material (magma), like granite and basalts.Scientists then measure the amount of the parent and daughter isotopes in a sample of the rock.Indeed, if Dalrymple’s data is representative, 3 times out of 26 the K-Ar method will give a too young date (though by only an extremely trivial amount for a rock that is really millions of years old). The one case that would have produced a significant error, the Hualalai flow in Hawaii, was expected (see the previous essay). Naughton, 1968, 'Radiogenic Helium and Argon in Ultramafic Inclusions from Hawaii,' J. This is done to achieve stability; however, the end result is a different chemical element (not carbon) because the atom now has a different number of protons and electrons.