html head meta http equiv content type text charset ISO 8859 1 title Google style body td a p h font family arial sans serif size 20px color 3366cc q 00c script function sf document f focus bgcolor ffffff 000000 link 0000cc vlink 551a8b alink ff0000 onload if images new Image src nav logo2 png topmargin 3 marginheight center div align right nowrap padding bottom 4px width 100 href url sa pref ig pval www de 3Fhl 3Dde usg Z0CJb WM4Hl Sg Uf Avcq REfrp5hx E Diese Seite personalisieren nbsp https com accounts Login continue hl Anmelden img alt height 110 intl logo gif 301 br form action search name defer table border 0 cellspacing cellpadding 4 tr b Web class imghp ie oe tab wi Bilder groups grphp wg news nwshp wn froogle frghp wf options Mehr raquo valign top 25 input hidden value maxlength 2048 55 Suche btn G submit btn I Auf gut Gl??2 advanced Erweiterte preferences Einstellungen language tools Sprachtools colspan id all radio checked label for Das lgr lr lang Seiten Deutsch cty cr country DE aus Deutschland ads Werbung services Unternehmensangebote about ?Well, those published attacks make it too easy for those out to discredit the idea system and its creator to overwhelm those Wikipedia articles with negativity using Wikipedia’s sacred policy of third-party sourcing and citations — Wikipedia’s Holy Grail: third-party sourcing from published sources…yes, articles written by the very journalists and bloggers who deeply dislike Neo-Tech too easily remove legitimate representation of the idea system by calling it “too much original material” as evidenced today, years later, on my father’s Talk page, Frank_R._Wallace, a section from the Talk page shown below: You don’t need third party references for this article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) , 22 July 2010 (UTC) Anonymous “Bi” and occasional ally (he used sock puppets) overwhelmed the edit wars by easily, repeatedly stating there are no third-party sources supporting original material or obvious facts.But he missed the fundamental point: that even with the rigorous debate on my father’s and Neo-Tech as evidenced today, years later, by the comments on my father’s Talk page Frank_R._Wallace .
That said, there was little in the way of third party sources to discuss the issue.Until a third-party reference to his opinions on biological immortality is made, we can’t include it here.—Cast (talk) , 18 August 2009 (UTC)You don’t need third party references for this article.This was despite the MOS for citations, which point out that strict citation is only necessary for disputed points.A short, uncontroversial explanation of Neo-Tech should be acceptable. I certainly don’t know anything of the philosophy, and so I cannot contribute anything myself; so there’s your explanation.We refused to speak to several reporters, for they were out to besmirch Neo-Tech. For decades we turned down all requests for interviews, for they were only attempting to smear us.